Wednesday, July 9, 2025

Dr. Suresh Frederick’s Contributions to Ecocriticism

 

Dr. Suresh Frederick’s Contributions to Ecocriticism

Introduction

Dr. Suresh Frederick stands as a significant figure in the realm of ecocriticism, particularly within the Indian context, adeptly merging conventional literary analysis with an emergent ecological awareness. Frederick’s work is characterized by its innovative approach to literary texts through an ecological perspective, broadening the scope of ecocriticism by integrating both Eastern and Western philosophical traditions and emphasizing the ethical interconnectedness of all life forms. This comprehensive approach marks him as a pioneering voice in the field, contributing significantly to the theoretical frameworks that underpin contemporary ecocritical thought. Ecocriticism itself represents an interdisciplinary endeavor within literary studies, focusing on the intricate relationships between literature and the environment, responding to growing concerns about human impact on the Earth's ecosystems. Ecocriticism intentionally directs its focus toward the connection between literature and nature, examining the relationship of texts to the world outside of textual boundaries, an area often overlooked or addressed solely from an ideological standpoint in recent cultural studies. Frederick’s unique contribution lies in his ability to weave together diverse cultural and philosophical perspectives, creating a nuanced understanding of ecological ethics and literary interpretation that resonates globally, particularly in postcolonial contexts where environmental issues are deeply intertwined with social justice concerns. His emphasis on ethical responsibility towards the environment aligns with the broader goals of ecocriticism, which seeks to promote a more sustainable and equitable relationship between humans and the natural world.

Interspecies Symbiosis

Dr. Frederick champions a non-hierarchical view of life, stressing the interdependence between humans and non-human species, thereby fostering a deeper understanding of ecological relationships. His literary works, including both poetry and critical essays, frequently foreground the importance of often-overlooked creatures such as squirrels, sparrows, crows, and insects, portraying them not merely as background elements but as beings possessing intrinsic value and playing crucial roles in the ecological balance. By bringing these humble animals and birds to the forefront, Frederick amplifies the voices of the marginalized and demonstrates the potential of literature to cultivate empathy and ethical responsibility towards all forms of life. This approach resonates with the principles of deep ecology, a philosophical perspective that emphasizes the inherent worth of all living beings, regardless of their usefulness to humans, and the interconnectedness of ecological systems. His writings serve as a powerful reminder of the ethical obligations humans have towards the environment and all its inhabitants, advocating for a more inclusive and compassionate worldview that recognizes the inherent value of all life forms. This focus on interspecies relations is consistent with indigenous worldviews that regard animals as kin, challenging anthropocentric perspectives that place humans at the center of the universe. Through his literary analyses and creative works, Frederick invites readers to reconsider their relationship with the natural world, promoting a sense of kinship and responsibility towards all living beings.

Biocentrism

Biocentrism, the philosophical stance that ascribes inherent worth to all living beings irrespective of their utility to humans, forms the bedrock of Frederick’s ecocritical perspective. In his analyses of literary works, such as Amitav Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide and Andrew Marvell’s “The Garden”, Frederick discerns a moral imperative to respect all life forms, cautioning against anthropocentric narratives that prioritize human experience over the well-being of the environment. He critiques literary works that privilege human experience while ignoring or exploiting nature, and instead champions texts that respect ecological balance and biodiversity. This viewpoint echoes the 'land ethic,' which posits that the morality of an action hinges on its impact on the integrity of an ecosystem. Frederick’s biocentric stance challenges the traditional anthropocentric worldview that has dominated Western thought for centuries, advocating for a more inclusive ethical framework that recognizes the intrinsic value of all living beings. This perspective aligns with holistic approaches that view humans as integral components of the ecosystem, where the destruction of any part of the biosphere ultimately affects humanity itself. Frederick’s analyses emphasize the importance of understanding and respecting the complex web of life, urging readers to recognize the inherent worth of all living beings and to act in ways that promote ecological sustainability.

Pocoecocriticism

Dr. Frederick emerges as a prominent Indian voice in the development of Postcolonial Ecocriticism, also known as Pocoecocriticism (Coined by Dr Suresh Frederick), a field that amalgamates postcolonial theory with environmental criticism, primarily focusing on the ecological and cultural damages wrought by colonization. This approach seeks to uncover how colonial practices have historically led to the exploitation of natural resources and the marginalization of indigenous communities, resulting in both environmental degradation and social injustice. Pocoecocriticism examines the ways in which colonial powers have imposed their own cultural and economic systems on colonized lands, often with devastating consequences for the environment and the indigenous peoples who depend on it. This perspective emphasizes the importance of understanding the historical context of environmental issues, particularly in postcolonial societies where the legacy of colonialism continues to shape environmental policies and practices. It highlights the need to decolonize environmental discourse, challenging Western-centric perspectives and promoting alternative visions of environmental stewardship rooted in indigenous knowledge and practices. Pocoecocriticism provides a critical lens for examining the power dynamics that underlie environmental degradation and social injustice, advocating for a more equitable and sustainable future for all.

Neotinaipoetics 

Neotinaipoetics reimagines classical Tamil Tinai poetics, an ancient system that classifies landscapes and emotional experiences. Dr. Frederick’s scholarship situates this poetic tradition within modern ecocriticism, emphasizing that environmental consciousness is deeply embedded in Tamil literature. His essays and editorial work illustrate how landscapes like Kurinji (mountains) and Neithal (seashore) are symbolic of ecological and emotional interdependence. By revisiting Tinai through a contemporary lens, Dr. Frederick asserts that Tamil literary traditions offer sustainable ecological philosophies long before the West began formalizing environmental theory. This decolonial approach reinstates the value of regional knowledge systems in the global ecocritical dialogue.

Oikopoetics, derived from the Greek “oikos” (home) and “poiesis” (making), focuses on ecological place-making through literature. Dr. Frederick applies this theory in analyzing how literature reflects and constructs ecological consciousness. His interpretations of texts like Robert Frost's poetry and Amitav Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide emphasize how setting and habitat inform identity and ecological awareness.

Dr. Frederick’s Neotinaipoetic lens encourages readers to see nature not as background but as a dynamic participant in narrative. His work underscores that literature rooted in specific places fosters ecological stewardship and ethical responsibility. Dr. Suresh Frederick’s contributions to ecocriticism through Neotinaipoetics and Oikopoetics have reshaped the field in India and beyond. By integrating indigenous literary traditions with global ecological theory, he has crafted a critical approach that is both scholarly and socially transformative. His work serves as a model for how literature can inspire ecological awareness and action rooted in cultural authenticity.

Conclusion

Dr. Suresh Frederick’s contribution to ecocriticism is marked by his unique ability to synthesize Eastern and Western perspectives, advocating for a non-anthropocentric worldview that values all life forms. Dr. Suresh Frederick’s work significantly enriches the field of ecocriticism through its synthesis of diverse cultural and philosophical perspectives. By advocating for interspecies symbiosis, biocentrism, and exploring the dimensions of postcolonial ecocriticism and Neotinaipoetics, Frederick challenges traditional anthropocentric views and promotes a more inclusive and ethical framework for understanding the relationship between humans and the natural world. His contribution not only advances ecocritical theory but also fosters a deeper sense of responsibility towards the environment and all its inhabitants. By emphasizing ethical interconnection and challenging anthropocentric narratives, Frederick’s scholarship encourages a more profound understanding of our place within the larger ecological framework.

References

Frederick, Suresh. (Ed.). (2012). Contemporary Contemplations on Ecoliterature. Authorspress.

Gaard, Greta, et al. International Perspectives in Feminist Ecocriticism. 2013, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203520840.

Garrard, Greg. “Ecocriticism”. Routledge eBooks, Informa, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203644843.

Goodbody, Axel. “German Ecocriticism”. Oxford University Press eBooks, Oxford University Press, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199742929.013.033.

Gray, D. J. “‘Command These Elements to Silence’: Ecocriticism and the Tempest”. Literature Compass, vol. 17, Mar. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.12566.

Hadiyanto, Hadiyanto, et al. “Human-Nature Ecological Interaction of African Traditional Community in Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart (Literary Ecology Approach in Literature)”. E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 317, Jan. 2021, p. 3015, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131703015.

Kopnina, Helen, et al. “Uniting Ecocentric and Animal Ethics: Combining Non-Anthropocentric Approaches in Conservation and the Care of Domestic Animals”. Ethics Policy & Environment, vol. 26, no. 2, Nov. 2022, p. 265, https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2022.2127295.

Middelhoff, Frederike, et al. “Texts, Animals, Environments”. Rombach Verlag eBooks, 2019, https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68373169.

Parks, Melissa M. “Explicating Ecoculture”. Nature and Culture, vol. 15, no. 1, Feb. 2020, p. 54, https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2020.150104.

Phillips, Dana. “Introduction: Special Issue on Animal Studies and Ecocriticism”. Safundi, vol. 11, Jan. 2010, p. 1, https://doi.org/10.1080/17533170903458355.

Pignatti, Sandro. “A Discussion on the Foundations of Environmental Ethics”. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali, vol. 24, no. 2, Apr. 2013, p. 89, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-013-0226-4.

Potts, Annie. “The Intersectional Influences of Prince: A Human-Animal Tribute.” Animal Studies Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2016, p. 152, https://ro.uow.edu.au/asj/vol5/iss1/9/.

Sarker, Md. Ali Rayhun. “Ecocritical Analysis of R. K. Narayan’s The Man-Eater of Malgudi”. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, Oct. 2019, p. 45, https://doi.org/10.34257/gjhssavol19is11pg45.

Sawyer, R. Keith. “Review: Hedström, P. (2005). Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytic Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 37, no. 2, May 2007, p. 255, https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393107299737.

Shoreman-Ouimet, Eleanor, and Helen Kopnina. “Reconciling Ecological and Social Justice to Promote Biodiversity Conservation.” Biological Conservation, vol. 184, Feb. 2015, p. 320, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.030.

Tajane, Suchitra Sharad Tajane Suchitra Sharad. Ecocriticism in Literature: Examining Nature and the Environment in Literary Works. May 2024, p. 2162, https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i6.5675.

Zapf, Hubert. “Literature and Ecology: Introductory Remarks on a New Paradigm of Literary Studies”. Anglia - Zeitschrift Für Englische Philologie, vol. 124, no. 1, Jan. 2006, p. 1, https://doi.org/10.1515/angl.2006.1.  

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

Papers Published by Dr Suresh Frederick (2024-25)

 Papers Published (2024-25)

1.Frederick, Suresh (2024). Vocabulary Acquisition through Deep Reading: Exploring the Potential of Poetry with ESL Learners”, in the Educational Administration: Theory and Practices | ISSN: 1119-5096| Vol. 30 No. 6 (2024). Scopus Indexed Journal. Published in June 2024. PP. 4950-4955

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i6.8969

 

2. Frederick Suresh (2024). “Is the Playboy of The Western World : A Celebration Of Violence? A Critical Inquiry”, International Journal of Communication, Languages & LiteraturePeer-reviewed Journal. Volume 7, Issue 1, 2024, pp 08-23.  

DOI : https://doi.org/10.53882/IJCLL.2024.0701002

https://arseam.com/paper?title=article_49527&issue_code=858146

 

3. Frederick, Suresh (2024). An Overview of Crime News Reporting and Investigative News Reporting” in Library Progress International (Print version ISSN 0970 1052 Online version ISSN 2320 317) XVol.44 No.3, Jul-Dec 2024: Scopus Indexed Journal. Published in July 2024. PP.6205-6209.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48165/bapas.2024.44.2.1

 https://bpasjournals.com/library-science/index.php/journal/article/view/1592

  

4.Frederick, Suresh(2024). Vocabulary Acquisition in Adult ESL: A Multimodal Approach to Life Sciences Terminology through Narrow Reading and Viewing” in the Educational  Administration: Theory and Practices |ISSN: 1119-5096|  Vol. 30 No.10 (2024). Scopus Indexed Journal. Published in October 2024. PP 642-647.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i10.9020

 

5. Frederick, Suresh (2024). Cultivating Ecoliteracy: Using Local Translations to Teach English Vocabulary and Environmental Values”, in the Educational Administration: Theory and Practices |ISSN: 1119-5096|  Vol. 30 No.11 (2024). Scopus Indexed Journal. Published in November 2024. PP 1181-1188.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i11.9198

 

6. Frederick, Suresh (2024). “Psychological Trauma in Buchi Emecheta’s The Bride Price” (Co-author Ms. T. Sindhu) in African Journal of Biomedical Research (ISSN 1119-5096). Scopus Indexed JournalVol. 27 Published in December 2024. pp 2527-2531.

 

7. Frederick, Suresh (2024). “From Mourning to Mutiny: Successful Communication Strategy Used by Antony in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar”. Shanlax International Journal of EnglishPeer-reviewed Journal, 13(1). Published in December 2024. PP 12-17.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/english.v13i1.8354    

 

8. Frederick, Suresh (2024). “Rooted in Landscape: Exploring Place and Identity in Tim Winton’s Novels”. (Co-author Thilaga, P. J. S.) in Journal of Ecohumanism3(8),  Scopus Indexed Journal. Published in December 2024. PP 12130 –. 12136.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5921

 

9. Frederick, Suresh (2024). The Natural Approach and Short Story Reading: Enhancing English Language Acquisition” (Co-author Ridgley, Jerrick), in the Educational Administration: Theory and Practices |ISSN: 1119-5096| Vol. 30 No.11 (2024). Scopus Indexed Journal. Published in December 2024. PP 1260-1281

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i11.9306

 

10. Frederick, Suresh (2024). “Early Seeds of  Bioregionalism: Place-Consciousness and Harmony in Andrew Marvell’s “The Garden”” (Co-author Edwin Moses) Journal of Ecohumanism ISSN: 2752-6798 (Print) | ISSN 2752-6801. Scopus Indexed Journal. Published in December 2024. Volume: 3, No: 8, pp. 12608–12612.

DOI https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5954

 

11. Frederick, Suresh (2025). “Trauma and Resilience in Buchi Emecheta’s The Slave Girl” (Co-author Ms. T. Sindhu) in International Journal for Multidisciplinary ResearchE-ISSN: 2582-2160. Peer-reviewed JournalVolume 7, Issue 2, March-April 2025. pp 1-5.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.40144

 

12. Frederick, Suresh (2025). “Representation of Western and African Cultures: A Contextual Study of Buchi Emecheta’s The Joys of Motherhood” (Co-author Ms. T. Sindhu) in The Creative Launcher (ISSN 2455-6580)Peer-reviewed Journal, Vol. 10& Issue 1(February, 2025)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53032/tcl.2025.10.1.02

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

SF's Ecocriticism

 Dr. Suresh Frederick, an Associate Professor and UG Head at Bishop Heber College, Trichy, India, has coined and engaged with pocoecocriticism in his scholarly work, notably in his book Contemporary Contemplations on Ecoliterature (2012). In this collection of essays, he contributes a specific study titled “Lost Land: A Pocoecocritical Study of Select Poems of Oodgeroo Noonuccal (Kath Walker)”. Here, he analyzes the poetry of the indigenous Australian poet Oodgeroo Noonuccal, exploring how her work reflects the loss of land and cultural identity due to colonial dispossession. Frederick’s pocoecocritical approach highlights the environmental devastation tied to colonial policies, such as land theft, and the resulting alienation of indigenous communities from their ancestral ecosystems.

 

Pocoecocriticism, a blend of postcolonialism and ecocriticism, examines the intersections of environmental issues, colonial legacies, and cultural narratives in literature, particularly from marginalized or indigenous perspectives. It critiques how colonial exploitation of land and resources shapes ecological and social injustices, often amplifying the voices of those dispossessed by such histories.

 

His analysis frames Noonuccal’s poetry as a resistance narrative, where the land is not just a physical space but a cultural and spiritual entity. By applying pocoecocriticism, Frederick underscores how colonial power structures disrupt human-nature relationships, a theme resonant in postcolonial contexts globally. This work aligns with broader pocoecocritical goals of exposing environmental injustice as inseparable from colonial oppression.

 

Dr Suresh Frederick’s contribution to pocoecocriticism is part of his larger ecocritical scholarship, which spans American, Australian, and Indian literature. His role as Vice President of OSLE (Organization for Study of Literature and Environment) and his extensive publications—over 90 articles—further establish him as a key voice in bridging ecocriticism with postcolonial concerns.

 

He has published over 80 papers in reputed journals and books, so this is a representative sample rather than a complete catalogue.

 

- “Suicidal Motive: An Ecocritical Reading of Four Poems”  

  Published in Essays in Ecocriticism, edited by Nirmal Selvamony, 2007.  

  Examines themes of self-destruction in poetry through an ecocritical lens, emphasizing environmental ethics.

 

- “Striving for Symbiosis: An Ecocritical Study of Selected Poems of Tagore’s The Gardener”  

  Published in *Indian English Poetry: Recent Explanations*, edited by Gauri Shankar Jha, 2008.  

  Analyses Rabindranath Tagore’s poetry for its ecological harmony and symbiotic themes.

-“Interspecific Relationship in the Select Poems of Charles Harpur”  

  Published in *Critical Essays on Australian Literature*, edited by K. Balachandran, 2010.  

  This article explores ecological relationships in the poetry of Charles Harpur, focusing on human-nature interactions.

 

- “Ecowisdom in Keki Darwalla’s Poems “Wolf” and “The Last Howl””  

  Published in Critical Essays on Indian English Poetry and Drama: Texts and Contexts, edited by Arvind M. Narwale, 2010.  

  Discusses ecological wisdom in Darwalla’s portrayal of animals and nature.

 

- “Lost Land: A Pocoecocritical Study of Select Poems of Oodgeroo Noonuccal (Kath Walker)”  

  Published in Contemporary Contemplations on Ecoliterature, edited by Suresh Frederick, 2012.  

  Combines postcolonial and ecocritical perspectives to analyse Indigenous Australian poetry.

 

- “Exploitation of Animals in Jack London’s The Call of the Wild”  

  Published in a collection of essays, Contemporary Contemplations on American Literature (2014)

  Focuses on animal treatment and environmental themes in London’s novel.

An Explanation for the article: “Lost Land: A Pocoecocritical Study of Select Poems of Oodgeroo Noonuccal (Kath Walker)”

 

An Explanation for the article: “Lost Land: A Pocoecocritical Study of Select Poems of Oodgeroo Noonuccal (Kath Walker)”

 

Introduction

Dr. Suresh Frederick’s essay, “Lost Land: A Pocoecocritical Study of Select Poems of Oodgeroo Noonuccal (Kath Walker)”, published in Contemporary Contemplations on Ecoliterature (2012), combines postcolonial and ecocritical perspectives to analyse the poetry of Oodgeroo Noonuccal, an Indigenous Australian poet and activist. Dr Suresh Frederick who has coined the term, pocoecocriticism”, made use of this term in his lectures from 2006.

 

What is Pocoecocriticism?

Pocoecocriticism is a hybrid framework that merges “Postcolonialism” (which examines the cultural, social, and political impacts of colonization, especially on marginalized groups) with “ecocriticism” (which studies the relationship between literature and the environment). Dr Suresh Frederick uses this lens to explore how colonial exploitation affects both Indigenous peoples and their natural environments, emphasizing interconnected oppressions of land and culture.

Overview of the Essay

Dr Suresh Frederick’s essay focuses on select poems by Oodgeroo Noonuccal, including works like “We Are Going” and “No More Boomerang”, to highlight the dual loss of Indigenous land and cultural identity under colonial rule. He argues that Noonuccal’s poetry reflects a deep ecological awareness tied to Aboriginal spirituality, where land is not just a resource but a sacred entity integral to identity.

Key Themes and Arguments

1. Colonial Dispossession of Land and Culture  

   Dr Suresh Frederick shows how Noonuccal’s poems mourn the theft of Aboriginal land by European settlers, portraying it as both an environmental and cultural tragedy. In “We Are Going”, the land’s degradation, urbanization, deforestation, mirrors the erosion of Indigenous traditions. He frames this as “ecological imperialism”, where colonization disrupts harmonious human-nature relationships.

2. Indigenous Ecological Wisdom  

   The essay emphasises Noonuccal’s portrayal of Aboriginal knowledge, which views humans as part of nature, not its masters. Frederick contrasts this biocentric view with the anthropocentric mindset of colonizers, who exploited land for profit. Poems like “No More Boomerang” critique modern industrialization while longing for pre-colonial ecological balance.

3. Pocoecocritical Resistance  

   Noonuccal’s work, as Dr Suresh Frederick interprets it, is a form of resistance. Her poetry reclaims Indigenous voices, advocating for environmental justice and cultural revival. By blending postcolonial themes (oppression, identity) with ecocritical ones (land, sustainability), Dr Suresh Frederick argues that Noonuccal challenges the colonial narrative that dehumanizes both people and nature.

Analytical Approach

Dr Suresh Frederick employs textual analysis to unpack Noonuccal’s imagery and tone. For example, he highlights her use of stark contrasts, barren urban landscapes versus vibrant pre-colonial ecosystems, to underscore environmental loss. He also connects her activism (e.g., her role in Indigenous rights movements) to her writing, showing how her poetry serves as both art and advocacy.

Significance

The essay is significant because it bridges two critical fields, offering a nuanced way to understand literature from colonized regions. By focusing on Noonuccal, Dr Suresh Frederick elevates an Indigenous voice, showing how her work speaks to global issues of environmental degradation and cultural erasure. It also contributes to pocoecocriticism as a growing framework, encouraging scholars to examine how colonialism’s legacy continues to harm both ecosystems and marginalized communities.

Conclusion

Dr. Suresh Frederick’s analysis underscores the urgency of listening to Indigenous perspectives in environmental discussions. Noonuccal’s poetry, through his lens, becomes a call to rethink humanity’s relationship with nature, challenging readers to confront historical injustices and their ongoing ecological impacts.

Wednesday, April 2, 2025

Papers Published (2024-25)

Papers Published (2024-25)

1. Frederick, Suresh(2024). Vocabulary Acquisition through Deep ReadingExploring the Potential of Poetry with ESL Learners”, in the Educational Administration: Theory and Practices |ISSN: 1119-5096| Vol. 30 No.6 (2024). Scopus Indexed Journal. Published in June 2024. PP. 4950-4955

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i6.8969

 

2. Frederick Suresh. (2024), “Is the Playboy of The Western World A Celebration Of Violence? A Critical Inquiry”, International Journal of Communication, Languages & Literature, Volume 7, Issue 1, 2024, pp 08-23.  

DOI : https://doi.org/10.53882/IJCLL.2024.0701002

 https://arseam.com/paper?title=article_49527&issue_code=858146

 

3. Frederick, Suresh(2024). “An Overview of Crime News Reporting and Investigative News Reporting” in Library Progress International (Print version ISSN 0970 1052 Online version ISSN 2320 317) XVol.44 No.3, Jul-Dec 2024: Scopus Indexed Journal. Published in July 2024. PP.6205-6209.

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.48165/bapas.2024.44.2.1

 https://bpasjournals.com/library-science/index.php/journal/article/view/1592

 

4.Frederick, Suresh(2024). “Psychological Trauma in Buchi Emecheta’s The Bride Price” (Co-author Sindhu), in African Journal of Biomedical Research, Vol. 27 No. 3 (2024). Scopus Indexed Journal. Published September 7, 2024. PP 2527-2531.

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v27i3.5872

 

5.Frederick, Suresh(2024). Vocabulary Acquisition in Adult ESL: A Multimodal Approach to Life Sciences Terminology through Narrow Reading and Viewing” in the Educational  Administration: Theory and Practices |ISSN: 1119-5096|  Vol. 30 No.10 (2024). Scopus Indexed Journal. Published in October 2024. PP 642-647.

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i10.9020

 

6. Frederick, Suresh(2024). “Cultivating Ecoliteracy: Using Local Translations to Teach English Vocabulary and Environmental Values”, in the Educational Administration: Theory and Practices |ISSN: 1119-5096|  Vol. 30 No.11 (2024). Scopus Indexed Journal. Published in November 2024. PP 1181-1188.

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i11.9198

 

7. Frederick, Suresh. (2024). “From Mourning to Mutiny: Successful Communication Strategy Used by Antony in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar”. Shanlax International Journal of English13(1). Published in December 2024. PP 12-17.

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.34293/english.v13i1.8354    

 

8. Frederick, Suresh(2024). “Rooted in Landscape: Exploring Place and Identity in Tim Winton’s Novels”(Co-author Thilaga, P. J. S.) in Journal of Ecohumanism3(8),  Scopus Indexed Journal. Published in December 2024. PP 12130–. 12136.

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5921

 

9. Frederick, Suresh(2024). “The Natural Approach and Short Story Reading: Enhancing English Language Acquisition”, (Co-author Ridgley, Jerrick), in the Educational Administration: Theory and Practices |ISSN: 1119-5096| Vol. 30 No.11 (2024)Scopus Indexed Journal. Published in December 2024. PP 1260-1281

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i11.9306

 

10. Frederick, Suresh(2025). Early Seeds of  Bioregionalism: Place-Consciousness and Harmony in Andrew Marvell’s “The Garden” (Co-author Edwin Moses) Journal of Ecohumanism ISSN: 2752-6798 (Print) | ISSN 2752-6801 2025 Volume: 4, No: 1, pp. 1260812612.

https://ecohumanism.co.uk/joe/ecohumanism

DOI https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5954