Dr. Suresh Frederick says, “Ecocriticism speaks for the voiceless earth. This approach is earth-centered and all the other approaches are ego-centered” (21).
Work Cited
Frederick, Suresh. “Ecowisdom in Keki Darwalla's Poems ‘Wolf’ and ‘The last Howl’”.
Narwale, Aravind M. ed. Critical Essays on Indian English Poetry and Drama: Texts and Contexts. New Delhi: Authors Press, 2010. Print.
__________________________________________________________
Dr. Suresh Fredrick says, “Human beings always knew that wild forests are inhabitable and that is why they looked down upon wild forests. That is why the forests are destroyed to made way for fields which would field grains. The animals are also left out” (13).
Work Cited
Frederick, Suresh. “Interspecific Relationship in the Select Poems of Charles Harpur”.
Balachandran.K. ed.Critical Essays on Australian Literature. New Delhi: Arise
Publishers & Distributors, 2010. Print.
_______________________________________________________
Dr. Suresh Frederick says, “Ecocriticism is an interdisciplinary subject. A knowledge of the life science is essential to study literature through this criticism”(14).
Work Cited
Frederick, Suresh. “Interspecific Relationship in the Select Poems of Charles Harpur”.
Balachandran.K. ed. Critical Essays on Australian Literature. New Delhi: Arise
Publishers & Distributors, 2010. Print.
_______________________________________________
Dr. Suresh Frederick says, “Ecocriticism is totally opposed to the anthropocentric view, i.e., human-centered view, subscribed to by many human beings. It supports the biocentric view. The human centered view is beneficial to the humans but the biocentric view is beneficial to both the humans and the biosphere”(14).
Work Cited
Frederick, Suresh. “Interspecific Relationship in the Select Poems of Charles Harpur”.
Balachandran.K. ed.Critical Essays on Australian Literature. New Delhi: Arise
Publishers & Distributors, 2010. Print.
_________________________________________________
Dr. Suresh Frederick says, “Symbiosis keeps everything moving in the evolutionary direction. This is vital for the growth of the biosphere. Symbiosis can be equated to integrative Oikos in Oikopoetics” (12 ).
Work Cited
Frederick, Suresh. “Striving for Symbiosis : An Ecocritical Study of Selected Poems of
Tagore’s The Gardener”. Jha, Gauri Shankar. ed. Indian English Poetry: Recent Explanations. Delhi : Authorspress, 2008. Print.
______________________________________________
Dr. Suresh Frederick says, “Symbiosis keeps everything moving in the evolutionary direction. This is vital for the growth of the biosphere. Symbiosis can be equated to integrative Oikos in Oikopoetics”(128).
Work Cited
Frederick, Suresh. “Striving for Symbiosis : An Ecocritical Study of Selected Poems of
Tagore’s The Gardener”. Jha, Gauri Shankar. ed. Indian English Poetry: Recent Explanations. Delhi : Authorspress, 2008. Print.
______________________________________
Dr. Suresh Frederick says, “Ecocriticism helps human beings to have a broader view of nature. It urges humans to have a biocentric view despite their apparently incorrigible anthropocentrism due to heir selfish nature”(136).
Work Cited
Frederick, Suresh. “Suicidal Motive : An Ecocritical Reading of Four Poems”.
Nirmal Selvamony. ed. Essays in Ecocriticism. New Delhi: Sarup, 2007. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment